Show me your money? I’d prefer decent management

I watched a documentary last night about a London plumbing firm trying to sort out its range of salaries. (Show Me Your Money, available on 4oD until early August.)

In the programme, the Managing Director encourages all staff to reveal their salaries and then negotiate amongst themselves to arrive at a more equitable distribution.

I am a huge fan of transparent pay policies and think they should be widely adopted. If you can’t justify your salary to your colleagues, and can’t live with the knowledge of what your colleagues are being paid in relation to you, there’s something wrong with the pay distribution. We don’t do it at JKP, but I’m not the boss.

However, there were some things in the programme last night that made me think this particular example is problematic.

  1. The pay discrepancies in place were, in some cases, shocking, and to me showed an incredible failure of management to allow them to come about. This wasn’t addressed. If your salaries are secret, it’s the responsibility of the company to ensure they are equitable, and the MD had completely failed in this duty.
  2. There was a case of a new starter in the call centre on £3k more than his colleagues who had been there longer. All but one of his  colleagues were women. Coincidence? It didn’t look like one.
  3. The fact that the most lowly-paid person in the company was a woman working in the canteen came as no surprise. It did surprise me, though, that she was being paid less than the recommended London Living Wage. Again, a total failure of management. Even after the pay increment at the end of the process, I believe this woman was still earning less than the London Living Wage.
  4. There was no pay review process in place. Pay rises came about as a result of going to the MD, talking about your kids needing something, and the MD giving you a rise. This is not a policy, this is a free-for-all. And, what’s more, it wasn’t even a publicised free-for-all. A portion of the workforce had no idea this happened, so stayed on the same salary for years.

In short, this is no way to run a business and it’s a mistake to use them as an example of innovative business practice.

The gaze

This poster is running on the tube at the moment and has been bothering me.

I don’t like it because the way the woman is looking at the man implies that he and his interests are the most fascinating thing in the world to her, warranting her undivided attention. He, on the other hand, gets on with actually doing something.

I haven’t read the book, but I get the feeling the poster slightly misrepresents the film. In almost all the press material I have seen about the film (reviews etc.) they are using this picture, which is obviously very similar, but has a far more equal feel about it.

In this version, you get the sense of these people connecting, and of the woman having something of interest to add to the story. These differences are subtle and important and the strength of the woman is lost in the need of the poster to show us more of Ewan McGregor’s face.